The full City Council initially approved Sewer Ordinance odorifera Air Quality, with the favorable vote of the council's Party, having voted against all opposition groups, who had requested that the agenda item be withdrawn day to pick up again in September.
The spokesman of the Municipal People expressed surprise at this request, as he considered what was required from the opposition was to step back in a case in which a few months before had a hurry.
Nevertheless, Juan José Gómez Hellin, Councillor of Environment and promoter of the Ordinance, has made it clear that given all the room for as long as necessary for both local groups, such as associations and residents in general they can present arguments to consider.
Once again it has been said since the government team, which will seek to draw an ordinance as consensual as possible to what awaits the contributions that can enrich the original proposal.
Surprisingly, although the opposition parties have full text for more than two weeks ago, none has made any proposal, amendment or comment.
However, the popular spokesman has again reiterated its intention so you can push through an ordinance of all.
It made explicit the difficulties found by technicians to develop the project, since there is very little legislation passed this specific aspect of the odoriferous quality, having taken into account the recommendations provided in the Guideline on Odour in Ambient Air and other considerations of studies and guides.
The draft ordinance approved today initially and have now included several amendments suggested by the Directorate General for the Environment, which will supplement several articles, such as 7, which is a section e) is added on the use of techniques European reference.
Or as in the case of Article 11 which is completed by a section 4) by which to carry out inspection tasks may require the assistance of the local police, as well as experts that are convenient.
Second Transitional Provision is also extended, Annex 1 with three new activities and Annex 3 with a section 4).
Finally, based on a report of legal services, the amount of penalties is modified to suit the precepts by Article 141 of Law 7/85 of 2 April, regulating on Local Government which sets out the limitations on the amount of the penalties of municipal ordinances.
These modifications have been used by opposition groups to reiterate its request that the agenda item be withdrawn, to which again Hellin Councilman Gomez said he did not understand that calling delay processing, while it was willing to give as long as necessary, so that everyone who wanted to participate actively could make their arguments or proposals, regardless of the statutory period of 30 working days from the publication in the BORM.
He reiterated the popular spokesperson in the will of the Mayor and his group to involve all stakeholders, regardless of dates to mark the legal deadline.
However, agreed to delay the initial approval, which apparently was more because, for technical reasons that justified delaying political strategies.
Source: Ayuntamiento de Alcantarilla